A Bite Mark Matching Advocacy Group Just Conducted A Study That Discredits Bite Mark Evidence

By Radley Balko
Washington Post
Apr. 09, 2015

In February, I posted a four-part series on the forensic speciality of bite mark analysis. The series looked at the history of the field, how it came to be accepted by the courts as scientific evidence despite the lack of any real scientific research to support its basic assumptions, the innocent people who have been convicted based on bite mark analysis and how the bite mark matchers, advocacy groups like the American Board of Forensic Odontology and their supporters have waged aggressive, sometimes highly personal campaigns to undermine the credibility of people who have raised concerns about all of this.

Read More













All original InformationLiberation articles CC 4.0



About - Privacy Policy