Journal Explores Incentive For False Results In Lab Tests For DUI

Sep. 10, 2013

A recent analysis published in the Criminal Justice Ethics academic journal suggests when technicians perform forensic analysis of blood and other evidence for cases such as drunk driving, the results can be influenced by built-in financial incentives to produce a conviction. Syracuse University Professor Roger Koppl joined Meghan Sacks from Fairleigh Dickinson University argue that even if false conviction rates are very low, a 3 percent error rate could put 33,000 innocent individuals behind bars every year.

Read More

All original InformationLiberation articles CC 4.0

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy