Journal Explores Incentive For False Results In Lab Tests For DUI

TheNewspaper
Sep. 10, 2013

A recent analysis published in the Criminal Justice Ethics academic journal suggests when technicians perform forensic analysis of blood and other evidence for cases such as drunk driving, the results can be influenced by built-in financial incentives to produce a conviction. Syracuse University Professor Roger Koppl joined Meghan Sacks from Fairleigh Dickinson University argue that even if false conviction rates are very low, a 3 percent error rate could put 33,000 innocent individuals behind bars every year.

Read More







MORE FROM INFORMATIONLIBERATION:
Oregon Schools Install "Isolation Rooms" to Get Around New Law Against "Seclusion Cells"










All original InformationLiberation articles CC 4.0



About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy