The Price of Silence: Supreme Court Rules That Pre-Miranda Silence Can Be Used Against Defendant To Prove GuiltJONATHAN TURLEYJonathan Turley Jun. 18, 2013 |
Bari Weiss' Free Speech Martyr Uri Berliner Wants FBI and Police to Spy on Pro-Palestine Activists
Telegram Founder Changed Mind on Setting Up Shop in San Francisco After Being Robbed Leaving Twitter HQ
America Last: House Bill Provides $26B for Israel, $61B for Ukraine and Zero to Secure U.S. Border
MSNBC's Joy Reid Celebrates Prosecution of Trump as Racial Revenge Against Whitey
Ukraine Tells The U.S. It Wants to Be Treated Like Israel
In a major loss for individual rights vis-a-vis the police, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that prosecutors could use a person’s silence against them in court if it comes before he’s told of his right to remain silent. The prosecutors used the silence of Genovevo Salinas to convict him of a 1992 murder. Because this was a non-custodial interview, the Court ruled that the prosecutors could use his silence even though citizens are allowed to refuse to speak with police. It is of little surprise that the pro-police powers decision was written by Samuel Alito who consistently rules in favor of expanding police powers. Read More |