informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Apr 20 2013, 3:58 AM Category: Tyranny/Police State Source: The Verge Print

Boston Bombing Suspect's Miranda Warning Put On Hold For 'Public Safety Exception'

By Dieter Bohn

Now that second Boston bombing suspect has been apprehended, there are still lots of unanswered questions swirling. One of them is whether or not he has been read his Miranda rights, which are designed to protect a suspect's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights under the US Constitution. The answer as of this writing that the bombing suspect is not being read his rights. "There is a public safety exemption in cases of national security and potential charges involving acts of terrorism," said US Attorney Carmen Ortiz at a press conference tonight, "And so the government has that opportunity right now, though I believe that the suspect has been taken to a hospital."

Talking Points Memo confirmed with an official at the Department of Justice that so far Dzokhar Tsarnaev has not been read his rights, so that the DOJ could "question the suspect extensively about other potential explosive devices or accomplices and to gain critical intelligence."

The public safety exception has existed since 1984, when the Supreme Court ruled that in very limited cases, law enforcement could question a suspect about imminent threats before reading Miranda rights. Those rules became established law, and in February 2011, the FBI itself published an extensive review of the public safety exception. In it, the FBI said that "questions designed solely to elicit incriminating statements" fell outside the public safety exception and that Miranda applied to them.

"Such interrogation might include, for example, questions about possible impending or coordinated terrorist attacks."

However, the Obama administration has long pushed for an expanded interpretation of the public safety exception. In March of 2011, a memo from the FBI leaked to the New York Times which "encouraged agents to use a broad interpretation of public safety-related questions." It generally instructs agents to limit their questioning to issues of "immediate concern for the safety of the public or the arresting agents," but does grant that there are "exceptional cases" in which "continued unwarned interrogation is necessary to collect valuable and timely intelligence not related to any immediate threat." In those cases, agents are told to seek higher approval whenever possible.

Read More





Latest Tyranny/Police State
- Turning America Into a War Zone, Where 'We the People' Are the Enemy
- This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
- Army to Continue 'Black Helicopter' Training Over Twin Cities Despite Anger
- Ferguson Cop Tells Protester "Go F*ck Yourself" & Threatens To Kill Him
- The Rapist Doctrine vs. the Tom Joad Test
- City Of Peoria Claims No Rights Were Violated When Police And Mayor Shut Down Parody Twitter Account
- MSNBC Host: Maybe Cops Need Military Gear to Deal With "Anti-Government" Groups
- County Officials Refuse To Pay Medical Bills For Toddler Burned by SWAT Grenade









Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
dougo

Posted: Apr 20 2013, 9:03 AM

Link
687 they just expained why none of us have ANY rights.those enumerated, and those not enumerated.the government employ comes before everyone else.the supposedly greatest country on earth is only slighly better than most.every body helps everybody else or not,till someone puts on a uniform with government markings.then they help themselves.told a joke the other day about cop busted for molesting a 16 yr old boy.at table with 2 leo's.I said when you frisk another man from 2-3 inches from behind and have a 6 inch boner ther is something wrong with you.1 laughed so hard.the other you could see the b/p rise and the lips purse,he was pissed at what I said about another cop.maybe he has the same problem?
Anonymous

Posted: Apr 20 2013, 8:31 PM

Link
6645 If he wants to come to this country and show no regard for its laws, and we're supposed to show regard for his "rights"?
Anonymous

Posted: Apr 21 2013, 7:54 AM

Link
687 I live in this country,born and raised,I believe in U.S.constitution,believe in most people,I don't believe in most cops.they are mostly brainwashed,myopic pigs.with egos to match.every time the cops go proactive they abuse their authority,on anyone and everyone who is not cop.these two were absolutely wrong in their actions,so were many of the cops and civlians who condone/d this mass search of others homes.


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

The Rapist Doctrine vs. the Tom Joad Test - 08/20By the Numbers: How Dangerous Is It to Be a Cop? - 08/21Furious About Ferguson? Work to Free Shaneen Allen - 08/20Ferguson Cop Tells Protester "Go F*ck Yourself" & Threatens To Kill Him - 08/20Taxfeeding Cop Threatens Shooting Spree Over Other People Receiving Welfare - 08/07City Of Peoria Claims No Rights Were Violated When Police And Mayor Shut Down Parody Twitter Account - 08/20MSNBC Host: Maybe Cops Need Military Gear to Deal With "Anti-Government" Groups - 08/20Man Picks Up Toy Gun At Walmart, Cops Shoot Him - 08/07

Rialto, CA Police Made to Wear Cameras, Use of Force Drops by Over Two-ThirdsCop Who Karate Chopped NY Judge In Throat Gets Off Scot-FreeFlorida Cop Smashes Compliant Woman's Face Into Car -- "Maybe Now You Can Understand Simple Instructions"VIDEO: Lapel Cam Reveals A Day In The Life Of A U.S. Police Officer (Tasing, Beating, Breaking & Entering, Stomping On Heads... and Laughing About It)Caught On Tape: Officer Sucker Punches Inmate In Face, Files Report Claiming 'Self Defense'Insult Person On Twitter, Go To JailSWAT Team Brings TV Crew To Film Raid Against Threatening Internet Critic -- Raids Innocent Grandma InsteadCop Karate Chops NY Judge In The Throat
(more)

 
Top