informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Apr 09 2013, 2:13 AM Category: Resistance Source: TheNewspaper Print

Mass. Supreme Court Rules Scent of Reefer Not Enough to Justify Automobile Search

Massachusetts Supreme Court Clears Drivers In Marijuana Search

In a series of three rulings issued Friday, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court cracked down on police who have been using evidence of marijuana possession as a pretext to search automobiles. Just two years ago, justices handed down the Cruz decision making it clear that automobile searches could not be conducted on the basis of finding marijuana (view ruling), but police have continued the practice.

Antonio L. Pacheco found this out as he sat in a gray sedan that was parked in a handicapped spot with four friends. A state trooper approached, noticing the fogged windows. He knocked on the window, smelling marijuana as soon as the window was lowered.

The trooper then went and searched the vehicle, finding a small bag with less than one ounce of pot on the floor mat behind the passenger seat. Nothing else was found in the vehicle's interior, so the trooper opened the trunk and began going through its contents. He found a black backpack that contained a semiautomatic handgun and no other items of interest. Pacheco admitted he had the gun for self-protection, but he did not have the "firearms identification card" Massachusetts requires.

In 2008, 62 percent of state voters approved an initiative that decriminalized possession of up to one ounce of marijuana. The penalty for possession was made a civil fine, meaning possession is not a criminal offense. To justify the search, prosecutors argued that by passing around a joint, Pacheco was guilty of "distribution" of marijuana, which is punishable by two years in jail. The state argued the trooper's search was valid because he was investigating the crime of distribution. The high court did not agree.

"An officer smelling freshly burnt marijuana inside a stopped vehicle, and an occupant surrendering a noncriminal amount of marijuana, did not, without more, support probable cause to believe that a criminal amount of marijuana would be found in the vehicle," Justice Fernande R.V. Duffly wrote for the court. "Absent articulable facts supporting a belief that any occupant of the vehicle possessed a criminal amount of marijuana, the search was not justified by the need to search for contraband."

As a result, the evidence of the gun was suppressed, leaving the state only able to impose a civil fine on Pacheco for the marijuana possession. The court handed down identical findings in the cases of Clint Daniel and Kiiyan Jackson. The American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, which filed briefs on behalf of Pacheco, was pleased by the outcome.

"Today's rulings mean that people who share small amounts of marijuana don't have to fear criminal prosecution or having police officers use the sharing of marijuana as a reason to search their belongings," ACLU legal director Matthew R. Segal said in a statement on Friday. "Just as important, hopefully these rulings mean that police officers will focus on serious crimes instead of wasting their time investigating people sharing marijuana."

Source: Massachusetts v. Pacheco (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 4/5/2013)





Latest Resistance
- Supreme Court Says Motel Owners Must Be Allowed To Challenge Warrantless Searches Of Guest Registries
- Free Range Parents Cleared: CPS Declares Kids Playing Outside Alone is Not Neglect
- Delaware Decriminalizes Pot Possession
- Video: Man Tests 3D Printed Semi-Automatic AR-15 Style Gun
- New Hampshire: Supreme Court Victory For Parking Ticket Vigilantes
- Another Victory Against Government Surveillance, This Time In Paraguay
- Iowa Supreme Court Affirms Right To Be Drunk On Front Porch
- Detroit Woman Buys Gun After Being Robbed, Uses It To Fight Off 5 Man Home Invasion









Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
dougo

Posted: Apr 09 2013, 9:56 AM

Link
687 cops WILL NOT follow their own rules much less the courts,or the voting public.they do not deserve honor they have dishonered.
dougo

Posted: Apr 09 2013, 10:13 AM

Link
687 like the cops are going to follow the law.ha,ha,ha.
Anonymous

Posted: Apr 09 2013, 1:09 PM

Link
2413 Laws, schmaws! Laws were made to be broken, or have you been asleep for the last 15 years?
Anonymous

Posted: Apr 09 2013, 3:08 PM

Link
75174 The pigs are ripe for the coming slaughter. Yum :-)
Anonymous

Posted: Apr 09 2013, 4:47 PM

Link
2462 COPS ARE ABOVE THE LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Page 1 of 1


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Mom Lets 7-Year-Old Play In Park, Cops Arrest Her & Charge Her With Child Endangerment - 06/29Video: Deputy Filmed Viciously Beating His K-9 Partner, Charged With Animal Cruelty - 06/28Oregon Legalizes Pot this Week -- But Thanks to the Liquor Control Commission, You Can't Buy It - 06/29Phoenix Cop Arrested After Admitting to Kidnapping and Raping a Woman During an Arrest - 06/29Supreme Court Says Use Of Cruel And Unusual Lethal Injection Cocktail A-OK - 06/29U.S. Citizens Sign Petition to Ban American Flag - 06/29New Gun Study Misses the Point on Self-Defense, and Uses Bad Data to Boot - 06/29How Chris Christie Used A Manufactured Terrorist Plot To Boost His Political Career - 06/28

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top