A Rejoinder to the RonPaul.com Affairby James E. Miller
Feb. 15, 2013
Justin's Multicultural Dream Dies: Mocked By Indians For His 'Fake' Outfits, JT Changes Back Into A Suit
'You're A Murderer!': NRA's Dana Loesch Accused Of Being A Murderer Repeatedly During CNN Town Hall
Loesch Slams Sheriff Israel For Hiding His Deputy's Inaction From Town Hall: You 'Said NOTHING'
'DIE CRACKER': Thugs Terrorize 12yo Philly Honors Student For Being White
'Dark-Skinned' Cheddar Man Was Just A Wild Guess
Sorry, but ICANN is hardly "private," it's a government granted monopoly with no competition, it's rules are reflective of the statist framework which it was created by and operates under. As a result, many of their rules are idiotic and antithetical to free markets, these trademark ones are case in point. - ChrisIn light of new facts previously unknown to me, the affair over ownership of RonPaul.com and RonPaul.org turns out to be more complicated than I originally considered. These warrant a written response -as does Robert Wenzel’s rebuttal to my criticism of his “designed” rights theory.