The Second Amendment Was Not Ratified to Preserve SlaveryBy Anthony Gregory
Jan. 31, 2013
Newspaper Fashion Writer: Melania's White Dress is "Scary" Racist
German Officials Respond to Migrant's Axe Attack by Calling for 'Mandatory Islam Classes'
French TV: Muslims Are The Real Victims of Nice Attack
Finland: Man Thrown in Prison For Using "Excessive Self-Defense" Against Home Invaders
Obama's Half-Brother: I'm Voting Trump!
An article at Truth Out by Thom Hartmann argues that the Second Amendment was ratified to preserve slavery, particularly to empower the state militia that used arms to enforce the institution through slave patrols. I wrote to Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, an historian who has written at some length about the history of American militia and whose working paper Deadweight Loss and the American Civil War: The Political Economy of Slavery, Secession, and Emancipation extensively discusses slave patrols as a key method by which slaveowners socialized the costs of slavery's enforcement.
Hummel’s response to the Second Amendment slavery theory? Don’t buy it. Hartmann’s argument is overstated “to put it mildly.” In particular, the argument suffers from “presentism, back-dated from the Civil War, where everything that happened prior in U.S. history was driven by slavery.”