informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...




Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
(more)
Article posted Jan 15 2013, 10:07 AM Category: Big Brother/Orwellian Source: Techdirt Print

Why Did The Secret Service Take Over Aaron Swartz's Case Two Days Before He Was Arrested

by Mike Masnick

Many have noted that the US Attorneys had made a new filing on the day that Aaron Swartz committed suicide. While the filing may look like just a standard procedural filing, some are pointing out that it highlights some highly unusual activity in the case. It had to do with Swartz's motion to get some of the evidence blocked from being used in the case, over questions concerning how it was collected. But one of the key things that come out is that, for unexplained reasons, the Secret Service took over the case just two days before Aaron was arrested:
MIT and JSTOR conferred regarding methods to prevent excessive downloading. Timeline at 3-4. On December 26, 2010, there was another episode of excessive downloading, which MIT personnel did not learn of until on or about January 3, 2011. On the morning of January 4, 2011, at approximately 8:00 am, MIT personnel located the netbook being used for the downloads and decided to leave it in place and institute a packet capture of the network traffic to and from the netbook. Timeline at 6. This was accomplished using the laptop of Dave Newman, MIT Senior Network Engineer, which was connected to the netbook and intercepted the communications coming to and from it. Id. Later that day, beginning at 11:00 am, the Secret Service assumed control of the investigation.
As Emptywheel points out, it doesn't make any sense for the Secret Service to be involved in such an issue:
According to the Secret Service, they get involved in investigations with:

  • Significant economic or community impact
  • Participation of organized criminal groups involving multiple districts or transnational organizations
  • Use of schemes involving new technology
Downloading scholarly articles is none of those things.

The same filing shows that MIT allowed all of this to happen despite no warrant, court order, or subpoena -- just handing over all sorts of info.
The disclosure took place only after the MIT General Counsel’s Office approved the disclosure of the information to law enforcement authorities even in the absence of a warrant or court order or subpoena – and at a time when MIT personnel were acting as government agents – and in contravention of MIT policy that such information, which exceeded that found in bank records or telephone toll records, would be disclosed only upon the receipt of lawful court orders or subpoenas, i.e., process complying with the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. Ă‚§2701 et seq. See Section IV, infra. In a separate email from Halsall to S/A Picket on January 8, 2011, Halsall told Pickett that he “hop[ed] to have the pcap/flows/videos/logs all in by to me Monday, possibly sooner – if you don’t already have a copy of the video or pcap [packet capture], I’ll make sure you get one.” Exhibit 2. No warrant or court order has been provided to counsel which would evidence the government’s having, even post-interception, acquired the contents of the warrantless interceptions by seeking judicial authorization as required.
As more and more people are looking at the details of what went down in arresting and pressuring Aaron, the case just looks worse and worse.

Gov Uscourts Mad 137971 59 0 (PDF)
Gov Uscourts Mad 137971 104 0 (PDF)





Latest Big Brother/Orwellian
- How Private DNA Data Led Idaho Cops on a Wild Goose Chase and Linked an Innocent Man to a 20-year-old Murder Case
- Law Enforcement's Cluelessness On Display In Congressional Hearing On Undermining Encryption
- New York: E-ZPass Used To Spy On Motorists
- Senior Police Officer Suggests Companies Allowing People To Use Strong Crypto Are 'Friendly To Terrorists'
- White House Pushes to Keep Power to Shut Down Cellphone Networks
- In Deal To Get Loretta Lynch Confirmed As Attorney General, Senate Agrees To Undermine Free Speech On The Internet
- Miami Police Set to Launch Federally-Funded Pre-Crime System
- CIA-Backed Company May Be Reading Your Facebook Chats









Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 15 2013, 10:43 AM

Link
75145 What subpoena? what court order? MIT was investigating what they perceived as theft of their materials, and they asked law enforcement for help. What's unusual?

Stored Communication Act and requirement for court orders etc would come into play if it was Feds' initiative to investigate something inside MIT.

If you go and file police report and ask them to help in your problem, do you require subpoena when they ask you what happened?
Anonymous

Posted: Jan 17 2013, 4:10 AM

Link
9885 SS huh? strange...


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy



Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

Who Pays When The DEA Destroys Your Vehicle And Kills Your Employee During A Botched Sting? Hint: Not The DEA - 05/02IRS Seizes $107,000 From Innocent Small-Town Convenience Store Owner For 'Structuring' Deposits - 05/02Man Faces 15 Years For Public Sex On Florida Beach, Couple Forced To Register As 'Sex Offenders' - 05/05Florida Cop Fired After Video Shows him Unload AR-15 on Fleeing Man that He Couldn't Even See - 05/04"Nickel Rides," "Houdini Suicides," and the American Torture State - 05/04Sheriff Shoots Real Estate Agent As She Shows House, Then Walks Away Because "He's The Sheriff" - 05/05Atlanta Cops Kill Woman, Say She Fired on them While Handcuffed in Back of Patrol Car - 05/04Two Videos of the Same Arrest in Baltimore Shows How MSM Does Not Give You the Whole Truth - 05/04

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up
(more)

 
Top