The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Sep 25 2012, 5:30 AM Category: Commentary Source: James E. Miller Print

New York Times Propaganda and Fallacies

by James E. Miller

Perusing the New York Times editorial page on any given day should give any reader of average intelligence the indication that only zombies of men aimlessly barking one liners of "tax the rich" and "support the middle class" actually take the writing seriously.  Certainly some of the paper's frequent writers add a bit of wit between their leftist rant. Yet the overall message remains the same: the state knows best.  From welfare to warfare, the propaganda machine is in full effect seven days a week.  Even much of the Grey Lady's reporting was revealed to be done only with the permission of the White House last July.  Apparently the "newspaper of record" is only allowed to recite what is deemed acceptable for the much-too-impressionable public.

Judging from the recent slew of exclusive reporting on President Obama’s vile and dictatorial counter-terrorism strategies, the New York Times looks to be the administration’s preferred mouthpiece when it can’t legally speak on its own.  Information is far too vital to the political class’s well-being for it not to be filtered before public consumption.  The various injustices carried out by the state and its uniformed minions wouldn’t continue if they were widely known so consent, to borrow a phrase from Noam Chomsky’s and Edward Herman’s famous book, must be manufactured.  Chomsky aptly puts it:

The bewildered herd is a problem we’ve got to prevent their roar and trampling. We’ve got to distract them. They should be watching the Superbowl or sitcoms or violent movies. Every once in a while you call on them to chant meaningless slogans like “Support our troops.” You’ve got to keep them pretty scared, because unless they’re properly scared and frightened of all kinds of devils that are going to destroy them from outside or inside or somewhere, they may start to think, which is very dangerous, because they’re not competent to think.  Therefore it’s important to distract them and marginalize them.

The goal of state-friendly media is to preach the civic religion of the holiness of government officials and their actions.  It is to instill passive complacency in public policy no matter the critical objections.  Two demonstrative examples in the New York Times last week stand out like a sore thumb.

Columnist and Princeton economist Paul Krugman is no stranger to economic fallacies.  In his unwavering effort to champion price inflation as a means to snap the economy out of its funk, Krugman penned an editorial recently defending Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's decision to engage in another round of security purchasing.  This effort, popularly known as Quantitative Easing 3, is considered "a welcome move" by Krugman as it would do a number of things including "making U.S. exports more competitive" and "encourage more private-sector spending right away."  To the layperson unable to think past the immediate effects of any given event, this policy might seem wonderful.  But of course printing money is never a panacea.  The various hyperinflations of the twentieth century are a testament to that.

Still, Krugman continues with a surprisingly candid point on how Keynesians view the creation of currency out of thin air.  Often times, defenders of the Keynesian doctrine will give different reasons on why inflation is economically beneficial.  Most will never equate money printing with actual wealth creation however.  But Krugman does take that step as he writes that inflationary policies ensure "stocks will rise, increasing wealth."

Did you catch that?  Here, a man awarded with the most prestigious honor an academic economist can receive is quite literally asserting that printing money creates wealth.  This is no out-of-context fishing attempt.  Clear as a cloudless day, Krugman writes that the existence of more dollars is the same as more capital and consumer goods. The most misunderstood economic lesson in all of history is that money is only ever used to facilitate transactions. In a fiat economy, there is no other function for it.  Fiat dollars are not the same as factories, machinery, or raw materials.  They are not smartphones, televisions, or refrigerators.  An increase in the supply of money only devalues the value of already existing dollars.  It often translates into higher stock prices because financial institutions are first in line for new money within an economy regulated through central banking.  It must be remembered that as hyperinflation raged through Zimbabwe, the country's stock market was the best performing the entire world.  It isn't hard to imagine that if the U.S. were experiencing the same kind of massive inflation which plagued Zimbabwe and drove the country's residents into abject poverty, Krugman would be cheering on the stock market's performance as parents paid for a loaf of bread for their children with a wheelbarrow of money.

The real purpose behind inflation is to give the impression of feeling wealthier.  This is just a psychological mind game combined that lasts only as long as money continues to spew forth from the printing press.  Like his posturing over fairness by increased taxation, Krugman relies on sparking emotion to back his recommendations rather than reason.  The New York Times editors themselves attempted the same trick in a recent editorial slamming the U.S. tax code for taxing capital gains at a lesser percent than income and wages.  Because of the differential between the rates, many private equity firms use loopholes to declare management fees as investments rather than income; thereby avoiding the higher tax rate.  This egregious action of avoiding filling the coffers of the state should be made "illegal" immediately according to the editors.

What isn't proposed is bringing the rate of taxation on income and wages down to a level close to capital gains.  Though such a lowering of rates would make the tax code more "fair" in a sense the option is neglected.  Higher taxes are necessary for continual government expenditures.  The appeal is for state dominance above all things.  The fact that capital investment is the only source of long term economic growth matters not to the government’s appetite for revenue.

In her book The Discovery of Freedom, Rose Wilder Lane spoke of an unquestioned allegiance to Authority as a driving factor throughout human history.  She saw mankind in a constant struggle between freedom and power with the ruling class trying to maintain legitimacy in the eyes of those who they lord over.  As long as their rule was seen as overly justified, it would continue.  The New York Times still uses its revered position to carry water for the regime; no matter the party in office.  That way it remains within the good graces of the ruling class and still stays relevant.

George Orwell made the rulebook on press propaganda when he wrote "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."  It is through mere pieces of paper called Constitutions that small bands of men have bestowed upon their successors the authority to rule.  As far as human achievement goes, none have topped the feat of supposedly vigilant media that institutionalizes a pitiful lack of protest by the masses toward state power.  On a daily basis drivel which would make an unkempt vagrant on the street seem semi-intelligent is spewed forth from newspapers and television in an attempt to fortify government with a believable justification to govern.  The man with a gun to his belly and a hand in his back pocket is spun tales as to why the thief in front of him is doing it for his own good.  He pays tribute not just through his wallet but by his convincing himself that it is for the greater good; a good that has been decided for him by others.

And just as rigorous thinking is frowned upon in the sphere of public education, so too is it kept away from the pages of the mainstream press.  When the news editors, statist commentators, and academics speak, all should listen and accede.  Thankfully, with the rise of the decentralized internet, the New York Times is losing its profit stream.  For those tired of the spin, its final demise can't come soon enough.
James E. Miller holds a BS in public administration with a minor in business from Shippensburg University, PA. He is the Editor in Chief at the Ludwig von Mises Institute of Canada and a current contributor to his hometown newspaper, the Middletown Press and Journal.

Latest Commentary
- Paul Craig Roberts Rages At The "Arrogance, Hubris, & Stupidity" Of The US Government
- Let's Talk About...The Plague
- With Mass Shootings, The State Makes Us Less Safe
- Good News: 27% Of Americans Say Government Is Their 'Enemy,' Not Their 'Friend'
- Fear Is The Name of The Game
- This Thanksgiving, Let's Say 'No Thanks' to The Tyranny of The American Police State
- Donald Trump's Presidential "Heel Turn"
- Katniss Vs. Power: The Lessons of Hunger Games

No Comments Posted Add Comment

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

VIDEO: Off-Duty Cop Rams His SUV Into Man's Car For Trying To Hold Him Accountable For Reckless Driving - 11/30Paul Craig Roberts Rages At The "Arrogance, Hubris, & Stupidity" Of The US Government - 11/30The Mathematical Paradox That Destroys The Argument For NSA Surveillance - 11/30Police Brutality Victim Mysteriously Killed a Day Before Receiving $450k Settlement - 11/30Two Brave Cops Under Attack For Exposing Militarization and Corruption in Their Department - 11/30Donald Sutherland Reveals The Real Meaning Of The Hunger Games - 11/27LA to Scan All Cars, Publicly Shame Anyone Who Drives Through a 'Prostitution Area' - 11/30Details of How The Paris Attacks Were Carried Out Show Little Effort by Attackers to Hide Themselves - 11/30

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up