The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Feb 24 2012, 9:27 AM Category: Cover-Up/Deceptions Source: Anthony Gregory Print

Insinuation as War Propaganda

by Anthony Gregory, The Beacon

In 2002 and early 2003, the Bush administration made its case for war with Iraq. There were assertions given about Saddam’s maintenance of weapons of mass destruction and ties to al-Qaeda. What was never said explicitly, however, was that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11. Yet by late 2003, seventy percent of polled Americans thought Saddam Hussein was personally behind 9/11. Bush’s Republican voters were especially convinced of this.

Yet Bush and his officials never said this. And after the multiple disasters of the Iraq war began to present themselves with great clarity, the Bush officials were questioned about their pre-war intel. Yet they could say, strictly speaking, one thing they never claimed was Saddam was behind 9/11.

Condoleezza Rice had said something about the attacks originating in the same region or area as Iraq. There was all sorts of insinuation that Saddam might have been involved. And surely the Bush team never put an ounce of effort into disabusing the American people of the completely false notion that Saddam was behind 9/11. The vast majority of Americans believed it--indeed, at times, more Americans thought Saddam was behind the attacks than believed the Iraq War was just!--yet it was not only completely untrue, but not directly rooted in any explicit assertion given by the administration. Various pro-war commentators had said it, but Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell--none of them ever did.

Fast forward a decade to the current day. Seventy-one percent of Americans--almost exactly the percentage that thought Saddam was behind 9/11--think that Iran has nuclear weapons.  It’s a small sample, but it is consistent with polls over the last couple years, each one showing a majority believing Iran already has nukes, and almost nine out of ten Americans sure that Iran is seeking them.

Indeed, talking with “respectable” liberals--the type who listen to NPR and watch Jon Stewart--I find repeatedly that even folks who don’t want to go to war assume that every reasonable American knows that Iran is on the brink of having nukes, if the regime doesn’t already have them.

What’s bizarre about this, other than the fact that there is no credible evidence that Iran has nuclear weapons, is that no one in a position of official authority is claiming it either! Every report from the International Atomic Energy Agency, even when framed in a way to make Iran seem ominous, confirms the “non-diversion” of nuclear materials to weaponization purposes. The CIA and intelligence community have consistently stood by the National Intelligence Estimate findings that Iran has not sought a nuclear weapon since 2003 (and Iran doing so back then is only suspected based on very scant evidence produced by the Israeli government).

What’s more, in the last week or so, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta stressed that not only does Iran not have nuclear weapons; there is no evidence that Iran even wants nuclear weapons!! 

Even if Iran wanted to make nuclear weapons, it would probably take three or more years. Iran is reportedly attempting to enrich its uranium to 19.75% LEU. Nuclear weapons require 95%--and there is no evidence that Iran has the means to do this. It is even more dubious to believe a nuclear-armed Iran would be some sort of unprecedented threat for the United States, but that’s neither here nor there.

So what’s the deal? The Obama administration (and the Bush administration, and the UN) have all had the same official position: Iran doesn’t have nukes, and the Iranians probably aren’t looking to get them. Yet seven out of ten Americans think Iran already has them. Meanwhile, every Republican presidential candidate except Ron Paul warns about the unparalleled threat of a nuclear Iran, and the Obama White House punishes the country with tighter sanctions and ever more threats.

Indeed, Obama has thrived on the insinuation that Iran has nukes. When he acted tough back in 2009 because Iran had been caught red-handed with its fledgling nuclear facility at Qom--a civilian nuclear facility that Iran readily alerted the international community to, consistent with its continuing adherence to the Non-Proliferation Treaty to which Iran is a signatory--he did so against a backdrop of insinuation that of course everyone knows Iran wants nuclear weapons. He did this even though all that existed at Qom, according to an IAEA official, was a “hole in a mountain.” Why didn’t the president remind the public instead that there is little to worry about, since the entire Defense Department and intelligence community confirm that Iran has no nuclear weapons program?

If a war begins with Iran, it will largely be on the basis of propaganda believed by the public, propaganda that the government has never officially articulated. In the past, the U.S. thrived on outright lies for war: the Gulf of Tokin Incident, Kuwaiti babies being ripped from incubators, and so forth. There has long been a fair share of unsubstantiated allegations involved behind major U.S. wars--the USS Maine being sunk by the Spanish, the Zimmerman Telegram posing an actual threat to the United States, the Serbians committing genocide of ethnic Albanians, killing many tens of thousands of civilians in the late 1990s, and so on.

Yet today lies and unproven allegations are not enough. The U.S. warfare state appears to thrive on insinuation in its war propaganda. The U.S. war machine’s top brass never outright declare the most provocative claims about U.S. enemies. That way, when the war goes south and people begin accusing the political class of misleading them, the empire’s defenders can easily say (accurately in word if not in spirit): “Bush never claimed Saddam was behind 9/11! Obama never claimed Iran had nuclear weapons!”

But don’t think for a moment that our rulers aren’t glad the American people believe what they do. It makes wars so much easier to wage when the public buys into all sorts of nonsense. The plausible deniability that insinuated propaganda gives the ruling class is just icing on the cake.

Latest Cover-Up/Deceptions
- Ex-CIA Agent & Cruz Supporter Who Runs Professional Shilling Company Allegedly Spread Lie About Carson Dropping Out & Tried To Frame Trump
- VIDEO: Clinton Voter Fraud in Action?
- Widely Reported Stockholm "Mass Attack on Migrants by Neo-Nazis" Never Happened
- VIDEO: Richard Gage Debunks Viral Blacksmith 911 Video
- VIDEO: Obama's 'Gun Show Loophole' Lies Exposed
- Democratic Debate Totally Staged: CNN Has Audience Practice Applause, Pre-Submitted Questions Planted
- FBI Frames Mentally Ill Ex-Con in New Year's Eve ISIS Attack
- Fire Engulfs Dubai Skyscraper, Building Fails to Collapse At Free Fall Speed

Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Feb 24 2012, 1:16 PM

This claim ,that Iran wants nuclear, is just another way of saying
that, that Americas,United Nations controlled army, wants destroy another
country that attempts to be indepedent of the will of the " New World Order "
bankers and corporations. America must wake up to the fact that, we the
citizens of the state Republics will not allow you; the Federal Government,
( that we created ) to take our offspring/children to fight another war for the
true terrorize. We must not be stupid again. Who gave America the right
to dictate policy to the world ? Americans are paying taxes to support wars
around the world. Its ashame that we seem to have money for guns and
bombs,ships and missiles and planes and bullets. But some schools in the
towns and the cities of America can't afford to pay teachers salary and buy
books and other supplies that students need. States are going bankrupt,but
we always have money for war. Oopes, I almost forgot . We also always
money for new prisons. And this country/coporation is building more.
Isreal, and the European Zionist Bankers want another war. So they
tell there puppets, in the UN, to start up the American war machine again,and
to attact on our orders. And of course, the dumb afraid Americans will ap-
prove, by there silence yet another war. Benjamim Frankin once said, those
who are willing to give up there freedoms for security, deserve neither.
The people of the world don't want American land or to destroy Americans
so-called freedom ( as George Bush once stated ) . They just want to be
left alone. Do not go to their countries telling whats best for them, and how
they should live,and what kind of government thay should have. In the eyes
of the world, America has become the new Nazi Germany. I hope that we
stay out of Iran and let them handle their national affairs the want to. The
UN, NWO must be disbanded. Then the world can have peace again.

David M. Schmidt

Posted: Feb 25 2012, 12:17 AM

146185 Thank you for a thought provoking article. It seems as if the American public has been conditioned to respond to insinuations by the US government and state-aligned media by jumping to conclusions and even extrapolating wildly beyond what has been insinuated. Thus the government and media don't even have to lie anymore; just utter dark hints and the masses will do the rest.

This is a good example of why critical thinking skills, a healthy skepticism, and an insistence on plain speaking is important.

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Muslim Woman Explains How The Mosque Obama Spoke At Treats Women (Hint: It's Not Good) - 02/04NYPD Cop Wins $15m After Fellow Cops Falsely Arrested & Beat Him At His Daughter's Birthday - 02/04Retired Cop Gets Taste Of Police State After Officers Bust In, Assault Him - 02/04Paul Joseph Watson And Stefan Molyneux On The Real Agenda Behind The Migrant Crisis - 02/04NYPD Cop, Whose Job Was to Bust Prostitutes, Exposed as a Pimp in Massive Sex Trafficking Ring - 02/04Hillary Clinton Suggests She Can't Be Part Of The Establishment Because She Is A Woman - 02/04TCU Professor Calls Police On Disabled Student Veteran Over Dissenting Opinion - 02/04Jeb Bush Preps The Noose... - 02/03

Cop Who Sought Photos of Teen's Erection in Sexting Case Commits Suicide Moments Before Arrest
Texas Man Sues After His Truck Seen Being Driven By Jihadi Fighters
When "Rescuers" Become a Death Squad: The Killing of Michael FunkHow Hillary Clinton Abused Her State Department Role to Help Her Hedge Funder Son-in-LawCops Fighting Mandatory Drug Tests -- Claim It's 'Unconstitutional' to Screen Police UrineNumber of Cops Charged With Murder Or Manslaughter Triples In One YearGood News: 27% Of Americans Say Government Is Their 'Enemy,' Not Their 'Friend'Prosecutors Pissed Colo. Juries Keep Acquitting Marijuana DUI Suspects