Court says recording officer was not illegalRuling clears motorist who secretly recorded a traffic stop on his phone
By Saul Hubbard, The Register-Guard
A Cottage Grove man who secretly recorded his interaction with a Eugene police officer on his cell phone during a 2008 traffic stop did not act illegally, the Oregon Court of Appeals has ruled, highlighting the ongoing controversy over how and when residents may record the actions of law enforcement officers.
The Cottage Grove man, 33-year-old Shane Neff, did not act illegally because the officer in question, Sam Ou, was himself recording the conversation on his cruiser’s dashboard camera and notified Neff that he was doing so.
Under Oregon law, recording a conversation is illegal “if not all participants in the conversation are specifically informed that their conversation is being obtained.”
In most instances, therefore, citizens must tell law enforcement officers if they choose to record them speaking, though they don’t need an on-duty officer’s permission to do so in public areas.
But in Neff’s case, the majority of the Court of Appeals’ judges ruled that Ou’s notification of his own recording was “sufficient” because the law doesn’t clearly state who must inform whom.
- Jerry Seinfeld Hilariously Trolls Cops After they Shut Down his Son's Lemonade Stand
- Texas Town Fires Police Dept., Hires Private Citizens For Security -- Guess What Happened to Crime?
- New Ferguson Judge Voids 10,000 Arrest Warrants
- Whistleblowers Band Together To Sue FBI, NSA And DOJ For Malicious Prosecution, Civil Liberties Violations
- Hidden Influence: The Rise of Collectivism (2015 Documentary)
- DC Mayor Reverses Course On Body Cam Footage, Opens Up Recordings To Citizens And Researchers
- Oath Keepers On Black Lives Matter
- Video: AR-15-Wielding Business Owner Defends Shop from Armed Robbers
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.