Taxpayers Foot The Bill For Nearly $1Billion In Payouts Over NYC Police AbuseChris | InformationLiberationOct. 16, 2010 |
Mike Johnson Pushes Debunked Lie That Israeli Babies Were 'Cooked in Ovens' On October 7
'It Has to Be Stopped': Netanyahu Demands Pro-Palestine Protests at U.S. Colleges Be Shut Down
'These Protesters Belong in Jail': Gov. Abbott Cheers Arrest of Pro-Palestine Protesters at UT Austin
Claim Jewish Student Was 'Stabbed In The Eye' by Pro-Palestine Protester Draws Mockery After Video Released
'Sniper Seen on Roof Overlooking Pro-Palestine Protest' at Indiana University
Taxpayers are subsidizing police brutality by the NYC Police to the tune of nearly $1 billion dollars over the past decade. The Associated Press reports: The fiancee and friends of an unarmed man killed in a 50-bullet police shooting on his wedding day said they wanted justice. The legal system gave them money — more than $7 million.Because police are insulated from the direct repercussions of their actions, they can pretty much do whatever the hell they want because the state will come to their defense and use taxpayer money to defend them. If they lose the case, the taxpayer pays to settle it. No liability, no problem. It's a classic case of moral hazard and could be easily solved by making the police personally liable for their actions. Instead of police acting like lawless criminals, they'd likely be more careful before slamming a stranger's head into a wall if they we're held personally liable and had to pay to defend themselves in court like any other pleb. Instead, the report says they're moving to insulate police even further from their abuses through passing a bill that would "make it impossible to pay out dubious claims." The report seems to insinuate by "dubious" they mean cases in which the police admit no wrongdoing and merely settle for convenience. You can pretty much guess whatever they do it won't address the actual problem, their lawless lack of personal liability. ___ Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com. You can read more of his commentary here. |