To man who flipped off Olathe police, a bird in the hand is worth four grand
By JOE LAMBE
Scott Schaper wasn’t happy when he got a ticket in Olathe. He struck back by flashing the officer the finger and giving voice to the gesture.
That got him another ticket for disorderly conduct. And now it has made him $4,000 richer.
City prosecutors dropped the disorderly conduct ticket and Olathe last week agreed its insurance company would pay $4,000 to Schaper and $1,000 to his lawyers, the American Civil Liberties Union of Kansas and Western Missouri.
Yes, it turns out, people can legally use the f-word against police and also extend what the law calls the “digitus impudicus” — the impudent finger.
As part of the out-of-court settlement of Schaper’s civil rights complaint, Olathe police also must train officers to take such abuse.
Schaper, who lives in Overland Park, dished it out last September after an Olathe police officer gave him a ticket for failure to yield.
He got frustrated because he was taking his children to school and the traffic stop caused them to cry, said Doug Bonney, legal director for the local ACLU chapter.
Schaper could not be reached Thursday.
Courts nationwide have long held that when it comes to such police cases, the word and the finger express discontent or frustration and are protected by the First Amendment, Bonney said. Police departments sometimes learn that the hard way.
In words that ring as a warning, Bonney said: “This is one of my favorite cases. I love the right to cuss.”
Bonney also cites a study on flipping the bird, which some call the most common and longest-lived insult in humanity’s history. Even the ancient Greeks wrote about it.
And now Olathe policymakers will have to write about it, too.
“We will learn from it and go forward,” said Olathe city spokesman Tim Danneberg.
While people can do such things, he said, “I don’t think it makes it appropriate for them to treat anyone that way.”
Will the case lead to less civility toward Olathe police?
“I would say it’s Olathe, Kansas,” said Danneberg, meaning that most people in the city won’t behave like that.
Olathe came out far better than Pittsburgh did in a similar case settled last year.
The Pennsylvania city paid $10,000 to a citizen ticketed for giving a police officer the finger and $40,000 more to the ACLU for legal work. In that case, the citizen flipped off a Pittsburgh officer who had told him to stop giving the finger to another driver.
Prairie Village’s police chief, Wes Jordan, the outgoing president of an association of Johnson County police chiefs and the sheriff, said of such abuse: “We have to just swallow it.”
Not that they like the taste.
“It’s unfortunate there are not repercussions on certain types of behavior that do not meet society norms,” he said. “What would the citizens think if the officer flipped them off?”
While police have to take it, don’t raise your middle finger or use the f-word to a judge in a courthouse.
That can easily get you jailed for contempt.
But even in courthouses there are shades of gray.
In a landmark 1971 case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a California judge could not find a man in contempt for wearing a jacket that said: “F*** the draft.”
- Video: AR-15-Wielding Business Owner Defends Shop from Armed Robbers
- No Cops Around, Man With Concealed Carry Permit STOPS Mass Shooter
- A Creative Idea For Dealing With Police During a Traffic Stop
- Iowa Court Rules Against Cops Who Arrested Woman For 'Illegally' Drinking Alcohol While Parked In Parking Lot
- Astonishing Heroism: Police Officer Thwarts Suicide Attempt By Letting the Jumper Land on Him
- Bloomberg Profiles Liberland, 'The Place of No Taxes Where Crowdfunding Rules'
- Concealed Carry Permits Skyrocket, While Crime Plummets - Study Shows More Guns = Less Crime
- Comedian Takes Out Full Page Ad In Local Paper After Being Ticketed For 'Parking The Wrong Way'
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.