The news you're not supposed to know...

Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand the World
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
Operation Gladio: The Hidden History of U.S. Sponsored False Flag Terrorism in EuropeThe New American Century: The Untold History of The Project for the New American Century
Article posted Nov 02 2007, 6:33 AM Category: Health Source: The Daily Mail Print

Is anything safe to eat? Cancer report adds bacon, ham and drink to danger list


Bacon, ham, red meat, etc. have been around for a long time and there was not the high level of cancers there are today.

All this nonsense is a front to hide the real causes of these new cancers: deadly vaccines, genetically engineered foods, synthetic chemicals in our food and water altering our hormones, an organized aerial spraying program spraying who knows what on the populace, and who knows what else.
A bombshell report yesterday blamed putting on weight, alcohol and a whole range of everyday foods for causing cancer.

Consumers were told to curb drinking, avoid processed meats - including bacon, ham and sausages - and cut their intake of red meat and salt.

Even supposedly healthy fruit and vegetables were said to offer only "limited" protection against the disease.

Last night, as the public wondered what exactly is safe to eat, there was a growing medical and food industry backlash against the �4.5 million study by 21 international experts on behalf of the World Cancer Research Fund.

Britain's top cancer specialist, Professor-Karol Sikora, called the advice "too trite and too dogmatic" and warned "no one will do it".

He added: "Alcohol, red meat and bacon in moderation will do us no harm and to suggest they will is wrong.

"I don't intend to give up my Sunday roast and glass of wine."

The report offers the toughest advice yet on guarding against cancer.

Its key finding is that being fat is as bad for you as smoking.

Excess body fat can trigger at least six common cancers including those affecting the breast, bowel and pancreas.

The study found strong evidence that red meat and processed meats can cause bowel cancer while there are strong links between alcohol and mouth, oesophagus and breast cancers.

The experts say there is no safe level of drinking.

People who take small amounts of alcohol to protect against heart disease should limit themselves to two drinks a day for men and one for women.

The report's guidelines include staying as lean as possible and eating no processed meats and only 500g of cooked red meat a week - about three 6oz steaks.

To reach their verdict, the panel sifted through 7,000 of the best studies on cancer, diet and exercise produced over the last 40 years.

Professor Martin Wiseman, the project director, said it was a "milestone" that would help people through a maze of conflicting health messages.

He said: "When individual studies are published, it is impossible for the public to put them into context and know how seriously they should be taking the findings. This report does this job for them.

"If people follow our recommendations, they can be confident they are following the best advice possible based on all the scientific research."

But Professor Sikora, medical director of CancerPartnersUK, said: "Cancer can't be reduced to a simple formula. It takes a great deal of eating the wrong foods to significantly raise cancer risk.

"This gives the impression that if you don't eat a sausage, you won't get cancer."

Richard Lowe, chief executive of the Meat and Livestock Commission, said: "We were surprised by the extremely draconian recommendation not to eat processed meats. Ham and bacon are two of the most popular meat products in Britain.

"The Food Standards Agency recommends red meat, including processed meats, as part of a healthy balanced diet."

He pointed out that the report linked obesity with six cancers, alcohol with five and meat with just one.

Mark Hastings, of the British Beer and Pub Association, said the experts did not how they decided even small amounts of alcohol put people at risk.

He said: "There's a risk attached to everything in life, from stepping outside the front door to driving a car. I don't think this report should deter people from having a social drink."

The report says the evidence linking obesity and cancer is much stronger than ten years ago, when the WCRF first investigated it.

Diet and obesity account for at least a third of cancers - as many as smoking.

And while smoking is declining in Britain, obesity levels are rising.

The report provides target figures for Body Mass Index that will keep cancer at bay.

The experts say there is no definitive evidence that fatter people who lose weight will cut their cancer risk, but it is a "sensible judgment".

A decade ago obesity was implicated only with cancer of the womb lining. Now, says the panel, there is "convincing" evidence that excess body fat can cause six different cancers.

They found a specific strong link between fat around the abdomen and bowel cancer.

There is also a "probable" connection between body fat and gall bladder cancer, and between abdominal fat and pancreatic, post-menopausal breast and endometrial cancers.

The report describes possible ways in which body fat fuels cancer, including promotion of the growth hormones and oestrogen, which can increase the risk of breast cancer.

Alcohol may trigger DNA damage leading to cancer.

Professor Sir Michael Marmot of University College London, who chaired the panel, said: "We are recommending that people aim to be as lean as possible within the healthy range.

"This might sound difficult, but this is what the science is telling us more clearly than ever. Putting on weight can increase your cancer risk, even if you are still within the healthy range."

Fast foods high in fat, sugar and calories should be avoided, along with fizzy and sugary drinks.

People should drink only one glass of fruit juice a day.

There were mixed messages about dairy products.

Milk was thought to protect against bowel cancer and possibly bladder cancer-but high-calcium diets may be a cause of prostate cancer.

Breastfeeding, in contrast, protects mothers against breast cancer and children against adult obesity. The report says exercise lowers cancer risk.

People should aim for an hour of moderate activity a day or 30 minutes of vigorous activity.

Professor Mike Richards, the Government's cancer czar, called the report "the most authoritative and exhaustive review thus far".

Dr Lesley Walker, Cancer Research UK's director of cancer information, said it reinforced the need for action on obesity.

She said: "We have been disappointed with the Government's response. Money has been diverted from delivering earlier commitments and there has been a lack of coordination across departments". Pamela Goldberg of Breast Cancer Campaign said: "A recent survey showed that fewer than 10 per cent of women knew that a diet high in saturated fat and high alcohol consumption increased the chances of breast cancer."

The Food and Drink Federation said the industry was "leading the world" in reformulating products to have less fat, sugar and salt.

It said: "The report is a timely reminder that Government, and others, need to do much more - particularly in encouraging citizens to get active."


The health secretary, Alan Johnson, is to call on planners to create 'healthy towns' in a bid to tackle the obesity crisis.

Mr Johnson says government plans to create 10 eco-towns should be altered to include new practical measures in a bid to encourage healthier practices, such as walking to school.

An initiative in 10 French towns which focused on young children has seen obesity rates in boys aged seven to 12 drop by almost half, while in girls of the same age it fell by almost a third.

Mr Johnson is calling for a wide-ranging approach across all Government departments in order to improve public health by changing the layout and design of towns.

Among the measures being considered are regular weigh-ins for children, increasing the number of cycle lanes, and creating safe walking routes to schools. Other ideas include creating GP practices in the High Street for easier access and improved leisure facilities, parks and playgrounds

Mr Johnson said: "Whilst people have to take responsibility for their own exercise and diet, as part of our drive to tackle obesity we are also looking at ways of improving the built environment, doing more to help people make physical activity a normal part of everyday life.

"International evidence and research shows that we need a large scale approach across the whole community to help tackle obesity.

"As part of our commitment to provide new eco-towns we are also considering making them healthy towns - through their layout, facilities and construction. If this works it could also apply to areas undergoing housing growth and renewal."

Latest Health
- Government On Nutrition: Often Wrong, Seldom in Doubt
- Game Developers Face Final Boss: The FDA
- Whooping Cough Vaccination Fail
- Study: Obese Americans Now Outnumber Those Who Are Merely Overweight
- Public School "Child Nutrition Supervisor" Served Students Reeking, Six-Year-Old Pork
- SSRI Drugs Linked to Germanwings Kamikaze Crash?
- Shocker: Eat Fat, Avoid Food Pyramid, Lose Weight
- Parents ARE Being Arrested For Getting Medicine (Cannabis Oil) That Works For Their Sick Children!

Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Add Comment Page 1 of 1

Posted: Nov 03 2007, 4:55 PM

Food is so important to our health. We must maintain vigilance on its content and safety.

Posted: Nov 03 2007, 4:58 PM

Bacon, ham, red meat, etc. have been around for a long time and there was not the high level of cancers there are today.

All this nonsense is a front to hide the real causes of these new cancers: deadly vaccines, genetically engineered foods, synthetic chemicals in our food and water altering our hormones, an organized aerial spraying program spraying who knows what on the populace, and who knows what else. Jenny Hope

I appreciate articles of this nature, that said here is my take on this...

Sure those foods have been around for a long time, but they are certainly NOT the foods my grandparents fed me. I am in my 50's, most of the food I grew up eating was not corporate raised processed gunk. We are in a crisis food wise, and it is affecting our population[in many ways].

I believe most of the problem is that most folks seem to think that the Govt is going to protect their food,.that is not happening. Follow the Money....that is the clue.

As far as safe food, let me put it this way, I spent some time reading articles concerning the stockyards

this article was written .....

Published: March 31, 2002

after I read it, I have completely changed the way I view a steak. Here is the Dig, each portion of our food supply is being treated this way, if left up to Corporate.

So do I believe that cancer is being caused by what we eat? Sure. Moreover, I don't think it stops there. I worked in the environmental movement of the 80's. I saw the handwriting on the wall back then. Nothing has changed, it has gotten worse. Our food has become part of the problem. I was not raised on this food, it wasn't like this when I was growing up. Sure, Genetically Altered Food is going to be another entirely unfathomable entity of its own, but its full impact will be on later generations, what we are seeing now is from something that has infiltrated our foods, air, water, medications, ad infinitum. but what one must do, is wake up, allow the truth to filter into your psyche, and allow educating ones self [to become priority].

Not listening to nightly sound bites for your health information. If the television commercials are paid for by the same companies killing us, you think tv is going to really tell you that? Get real! Get educated. Turn Off Your TV,,,,,read, study, get involved in community organizations that grow local. Be active...

Add Comment


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy

Advanced Search


Remember Me
Forgot Password?

World's Most 'Adorable' Drug Kingpin Is Actually The Daughter of Texas DEA Head Honcho - 11/26Heroic Cops Protect Community by Raiding a Group of 90-Yo Women Playing Mahjong - 11/26Good News: Law Schools In Decline, Bar Passage Rates Plummeting - 11/26Let's Talk About...The Plague - 11/26VIDEO: Language Barrier Leads to Seattle Cops Punching Man 17 Times - 11/26Donald Sutherland Reveals The Real Meaning Of The Hunger Games - 11/27VIDEO: Chicago Protester Gives Cop Epic Stare Down - 11/26Drone Pilots Have Bank Accounts and Credit Cards Frozen by Feds For Exposing US Murder - 11/27

Man Follows Speeding Cop, Finds Out He Was Speeding To Buy PeanutsMission Creeps: Homeland Security Agents Confiscate Women's Panties For 'Copyright Infringement'Cop Shoots Couple's Dog, Threatens Jail For Trying To Save Dog's LifeSWAT Team Shoots Teen Girl & Her Dog During Pot Raid On Wrong HomeDurham, NC Cop Testifies Faking 911 Calls To Enter Homes Is "Official Policy"Indiana Sheriff Says US A "War Zone" To Justify New MRAP Military VehicleTampa Cops Surveil Pot Dealer, Catch Him Selling Pot, Raid His Home & Kill Him"You Just Shot An Unarmed Man!": Witness Says Police Shot His Friend With His Hands Up