Plague of bioweapons accidents afflicts the US

Debora MacKenzie

Deadly germs may be more likely to be spread due to a biodefence lab accident than a biological attack by terrorists.

Plague, anthrax, Rocky Mountain spotted fever - these are among the bioweapons some experts fear could be used in a germ warfare attack against the US. But the public has had near-misses with those diseases and others over the past five years, ironically because of accidents in labs that were working to defend against bioterrorists. Even worse, they may be only the tip of an iceberg.

The revelations come from Ed Hammond of the Sunshine Project, a biosafety pressure group based in Austin, Texas, US, who after persistent requests got the minutes of university biosafety committees using the US Freedom of Information Act. The minutes are accessible to the public by law.

There are now 20,000 people at 400 sites around the US working with putative bioweapons germs, says Hammond, 10 times more than before the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Some scientists have warned for years that more people handling dangerous germs are a recipe for accidents.

Unreported incidents?

The fears have been borne out by publicised infections of lab workers with tularemia, brucellosis and Q fever.

The Q fever incident took place at Texas A&M University, which has now been ordered to stop research into potential bioweapons while an investigation takes place.

However, Hammond’s minutes contain further, previously unreported, slip-ups:

• At the University of New Mexico, one worker was jabbed with an anthrax-laden needle, and another with a syringe containing an undisclosed, genetically engineered microbe.

• At the Medical University of Ohio, workers were exposed to and infected with Valley Fever.

• At the University of Chicago, there was another puncture with an undisclosed agent normally requiring heavy containment, probably anthrax or plague.

• At the University of California at Berkeley, workers handled deadly Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, which spreads in the air, without containment when it was mislabelled as harmless.

• At the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, workers were exposed to TB when containment equipment failed.

As yet, none of the accidents have been serious in outcome. But, Hammond fears, more such accidents may go unreported. "Instead of a 'culture of responsibility', the federal government has instilled a culture of denial" he says. "Labs hide problems, and think that accident reporting is for masochists"

Reporting essential

Without stringently enforced reporting rules, he says, labs have every reason to cover up accidents. They want to avoid losing research funds, and fear the massive official reaction to any accident – such as the imprisonment of plague researcher Thomas Butler in 2003. And he claims Texas A&M officials have said they now regret reporting the Q fever incident.

"I think the answer is to create a level playing field by having clear and absolutely mandatory reporting requirements," says Hammond. "Eliminate even the possibility of an institution claiming that it does not have to report infections."

"The labs will say, you can't do that because then people won't report accidents," says Hammond. "Well, I think it's pretty clear that people don't report accidents as it stands."

SHARE:

Email This

Latest Cover-Up/Deceptions
- Boston Bombings: State Trooper Fired Over 10 Shots At Unmarked Police Car, Transit Officer Likely Victim Of Friendly Fire
- Officials: Boston Suspect Had No Firearm When Barrage Of Bullets Hit Hiding Place
- 7-Eleven robbery not related to Boston bombing suspects
- Boston Marathon Witness Interview: Police Told Us Bomb Drill Was 'Training Exercise'
- Why the DA Murder Publicity Stopped
- Eyewitness: Authorities "Must Have Known" About Bombing
- ATF Sting Operation Used Brain-Damaged Man, Then Charged Him
- Esquire's Bin Laden Killing Story "Complete BS," Says SEAL Team 6 Member

Comments

Add Comment

Page 1 of 1

David Stanley

Posted: Jul 07 2007, 12:21 PM

Link

905

I think the NHS (National Health Service) in the UK provides considerable added support to this story. Not so long ago In delapidated buildings with low technology medicine, the doctors and nurses charged with care delivered just that to their patients. In strict adherence from the times of Florence Nightingale (a British nurse) hospitals were scrupulously clean.

Amongst other changes, in came the concept of private contractors. Although justified on the grounds of cost, the real cost was hidden behind something called PFI (private finance initiative). This was one of Gordon Brown's fiddles that rather than saving money threatens the UK economy. Just the death rates from admitted cases of hospital specific infections is in the thousands per annum. It is so prevalent, one doesn't need to be informed by the media, people tend to call on the services of the NHS at some point, and it is not unusual for treatment for a broken limb to result in a life threatening disease. People tend to know someone who has been through this.

Just as 'the state' only exists to protect people, it is reasonable to expect a hospital is there to offer remedial therapy not to risk killing their patients for no good reason but they do. The pharmaceutical companies must be laughing all the way to the bank, post operative care includes a battery of exquisite antibiotics, almost simply because no one bothered to clean the floor. As antibiotics damage the immune system, it has some similarities with the war on terror.

The UK tends to be effective at protecting its secrets, a bodged anthrax test killed members of the public in the UK has not to my knowledge been covered in any detail in the media. I can't remember what they put on the death certificates, I think it was pneumonia. That experiment was meant to be on an Island but they have conducted nuclear experiments in London. I suggest that is not just criminal negligence, but criminally insane. It highlights the danger of secrecy, whatever the risk factor, how would the public react if they knew an American car factory was built in London on a hot zone?

Add Comment

Name

Comment

* No HTML

Verification *

Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below

PLEASE NOTE

Please see our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer - Privacy Policy