informationliberation
The news you're not supposed to know...


An Introduction to Austrian Economics: Understand Economics, Understand Everything

The Obama Deception: The Mask Comes Off
The Century of the Self: The Untold History of Controlling the Masses Through the Manipulation of Unconscious Desires
The Disappearing Male: From Virility to Sterility

Fall of the Republic: America's Last Stand
Operation Gladio: "One of the most secret programs that ever existed"
The Age of Transitions: The Dystopia Planned For Our Future
(more)
Article posted Aug 21 2006, 11:40 PM Category: Cover-Up/Deceptions Source: Human Events Print

North American Union Threatens U.S. Sovereignty

Alan Caruba

The problem with the Bush administration is that not enough of its officials have read the U.S. Constitution. Take, for example, Section 2 of Article 2. When dealing with foreign nations, it says that the President “shall have the power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur….”

So, why is President Bush and his administration seeking to establish a North American Union that would, in effect, abolish the borders between Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America?

Moreover, it would involve our government in so many common regulatory mandates with these two nations as to render the sovereignty of the United States a memory of what national self-governance is supposed to be.

The name of this effort is called the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) and, guess what, it has not been submitted to the Senate for its oversight or concurrence because, by some magic of governmental definition, it is not a treaty. Instead, its administration is buried in the bowels of the Commerce Department.

It does have, however, the blessing of the political and corporate elites of all three nations. A visit to the SPP website says it “was launched in March of 2005 as a trilateral effort to increase security and enhance prosperity among the United States, Canada and Mexico through greater cooperation and information sharing.”

It is an attack on American sovereignty. In the smoothest and most soothing writing you will find anywhere, the website spells out the wonders of SPP. They include the North American Competitiveness Council, the North American Energy Security Initiative, the North American Emergency Management plan, and plans for “smart, secure borders.” And right now there are “working groups” whose purpose is to “improve productivity, reduce the costs of trade, and enhance the quality of life.”

And if you like snake oil, permit SPP to sell it to you by the barrel, but the boxcar, and by the tanker.

The SPP didn’t start out as an idea the presidents of the three nations started kicking around on March 23, 2005 in Waco, Texas, but it became the official policy of the United States at a special summit convened by President Bush and joined by then Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin.

Like so many really bad foreign policy concepts, SPP owes its origins to the Council on Foreign Relations; in this case, CFR’s Task Force on North America. Its report, “Building a North American Community” envisions the elimination of U.S. borders in just five years. Like termites eating away at the sovereignty of the United States of America, this grandiose scheme is a major threat to American security and prosperity.

The Marxist majordomo of this task force is Professor Robert Pastor who told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee “The best way to secure the United States today is not at our two borders with Mexico and Canada but at the borders of North America as a whole.” Oh, yeah????

This surely explains why Mexico is doing such a great job of stopping the drug smugglers or the one million Mexicans who each year consider the U.S. border a mere fiction in their pursuit of jobs President Bush keeps telling us Americans won’t take. This is pure bunk and dangerous bunk at that.

I have many Canadian friends, but it seems to me Canada took too long to discover it had some fanatical Muslims in its midst who were plotting terrible things. Frankly, I want us to cooperate against a common enemy, but I do not want to place the responsibility for America’s security in anyone’s hands, but our own.

A North American Union promises not only security, says SPP, but prosperity too. Without SPP, however, the three nations already do more than $800 billion in trilateral trade.

Surely the U.S. needs Mexico’s help to improve our economy? As the economist, Robert J. Samuelson, noted in a June column, “The subtext for the United States immigration debate is Mexico. Why doesn’t its economy grow faster, creating more jobs and higher living standards?” The answer to that has something to do with the endemic corruption that infests all levels of Mexico’s governmental and business sectors. Something is very wrong when Mexico’s economy must literally depend on the billions its illegal aliens send home from the U.S.

In 2002, the then-Mexican Foreign Minister Jorge Castanega explained to the local press that destroying the border involved “the metaphor of Gulliver, of ensnarling the giant. Tying it up, with nails, with thread, with 20,000 nets that bog it down: these nets being norms, principles, resolutions, agreements, and bilateral, regional and international covenants.”

Bush43 is carrying out Bush41’s daft and dangerous “new world order” and his indifference to America’s illegal immigration crisis is symptomatic of the SPP objectives.

On June 15, U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, Mexican Economy Minister Sergio Garcia de Alba, and Canadian Minister of Industry Maxime Bernier joined North American business leaders to launch the North American Competitiveness Council. The objective is the promotion of “regional competitiveness in the global community.”

As if the floundering economies of the member nations of the European Union were not warning enough, it is proposed that the United States enter into a similar union.

A lot of corporations with global interests like this idea. Among those sponsoring the North American Union are FedEx Corporation, Mittal Steel USA, General Motors Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Campbell’s Soup Company, Gillette Inc., Merck & Company, and Wal-Mart Stores.

Since the United States is already a signatory to NAFTA and CAFTA, why is SPP necessary? Just how many treaties, agreements and protocols are necessary to promote trade and economic growth?

Just how many nets and norms, traps and snares, will ultimately undermine U.S. prosperity, drive down the wages of America’s middle class, and improve the ability of the Mexican drug cartels to deliver their goods?

Like termites eating away at the sovereignty of the United States of America, this grandiose scheme, hatched in some darkened cavern of the Council on Foreign Affairs, is a major threat to American security and prosperity.

It was been introduced by fiat, by executive action, by a “summit” of the three nation’s leaders, and the time is long overdue for the Senate to demand to exercise its Constitutional responsibility and right to determine if it wishes to give its consent to yet another “entangling alliance.”


SHARE:



Latest Cover-Up/Deceptions
- Demolishing Anti-Iran Propaganda
- Flashback: The Toppling of the Saddam Statue Was Completely Staged
- US crime lab found distorting evidence to put hundreds of innocent people in jail
- Cybersecurity Lie Exposed: Power Plants Are Not Connected To The Internet
- Jack Conway Campaign CAUGHT Posing As Racist Militant Rand Paul Supporter
- Naked Body Scanners: Monumental Cover Up Exposed
- Ok, So Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Was OBVIOUSLY Not Subject To An Assassination Attempt
- Is Project Vigilant A Hoax?









Comments 1 - 4 of 4 Add Comment Page 1 of 1
Anonymous

Posted: Sep 12 2006, 4:07 PM

Link
650 Amen.
Anonymous

Posted: Jun 10 2007, 10:54 AM

Link
71237 WHAT DOES THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION MEAN FOR AMERICAN AND CANADIAN WORKERS?

Any one who has done their homework and researched the SPP and the proposed NAU and Amero knows that this is an attempt by the globalist corporations to completely bypass the representative forms of government established by law in America and Canada. Their goal is to place full power over the nations of Canada, Mexico and the United States in the hands of international corporate policy makers. Those policy makers will be accountable to no one; in fact, the fascist dictators of the NAU will not be elected representatives of the people. The NAU leaders will be appointed by multi-national corporate policy makers!

Does anyone really understand what the North American Union and the "Amero" truly means? It is in the best interest of the globalist corporations to establish the currency value of the Amero by "averaging" the currencies of Mexico, the US and Canada together. It is additionally in the best interest of corporate globalization to average the minimum wages presently in place for the three nations involved. The current annual minimum wage in Canada is $11,157 a year. The current federally mandated minimum wage for Americans stands at $5.15 and hour or $10,712 annually. However, the average minimum wage in Mexico is only $1,093 a year, which works out to only about $0.53 an hour! If you averaged the minimum wages of all three countries to come up with a standard that was "acceptable" to NAU corporate policy makers, we come up with an average minimum wage of $7676.66 annually, which is a minimum wage $3.65 cents an hour! Would this be profitable to the corporations? You bet it would be! Would the proposed NAU literally "flood" both Canada and the US with approximately 30 million Mexican nationals who would give anything to be making $3.65 an hour rather than the $0.53 cents an hour which is the currant minimum wage in Mexico? You bet the Mexican citizens would come north in droves and the corporations would love it! The NAU is literally going to put American and Canadian citizens out of work!

Furthermore, if the war in Iraq is still going on in 2010 which is the targeted date for establishment of the NAU and Amero, which military force will be used to insure that Canadians and Americans don't riot in the streets over this? After all, the Patriot Act gives the military the right to turn on our own nation! It would certainly not be the militaries of Canada and the U.S. that would be used to enforce NAU policies; after all, the militaries of Canada and America are all over fighting the war in the Middle East! Once the NAU is established, it will give the Corporations the right to use the military of Mexico to enforce riot control and NAU policies in America and Canada! Would Mexican nationals hoping to make a better wage be willing to turn their guns on Americans and Canadians who would be furious about the NAU? Sure they would! In reality, The NAU promises to raise the living standards for Mexico's citizens while it lowers the wages and standard of living for Americans and Canadians!

I am not a racist by any means. In fact, I have a son in law who was born in Mexico and I consider him a dear member of my family. However, the SPP and NAU writing is on the wall and promises to create tremendous racial tensions in America and Canada against Spanish American people from Mexico. Out of the three countries that will make up the proposed North American Union, Mexico is the only country whose citizens actually stand to gain. American and Canadian workers stand to lose the minimum wage standards, labor laws and currency values presently standardized in both nations.



Anonymous

Posted: Aug 28 2007, 11:15 PM

Link
68188 The citizens of the world need to wake up. These corporations invest millions (if not billions) to brainwash the public with mainstream media fluff, lies, and propaganda. Alot of people often still think of "governements" or nations as the ones in control or the ones in power, but in reality corporations are the ones in charge. The global private interests will do ANYTHING to maintain their power, their stealth. The elections are rigged by corporations like diebold, while the canidates are puppets to this globalist game. America and Britain have been sold. Somehow, threw hard work, WE need to take our sovereignty back. VOTE RON PAUL! The politicians don't want major turnouts at the polls, its easier to rigg elections, lie, and cheat if they have to bull a smaller group of people, its a majority turnout that could make a difference.
Anonymous

Posted: Oct 24 2007, 11:03 AM

Link
6753 For more on the NAU, download the Oct. 15 issue of The New American magazine, for free:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/files/documents/MergerInTheMaking.pdf

It's about 4 MB. Enjoy!


Add Comment
Name
Comment

* No HTML


Verification *
Please Enter the Verification Code Seen Below
 


PLEASE NOTE
Please read our About Page, our Disclaimer, and our Comments Policy.

Please note: InformationLiberation is neither liberal or conservative. When one takes the time to research the "liberal elite," whom the conservatives oppose, and the "conservative elite," whom the liberals oppose, one finds both "elite" are one and the same. "Liberal" or "Conservative" is not a substantive choice, it is only the carefully crafted illusion of a choice, for both parties come together when they are instructed to.

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."
A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, 1933

"Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure."
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, 1936 issue of The New York Times.

If you care to know who runs the world you live in, view these films. If you care not then I leave you with this quote to ponder:

"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."
Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961 Audio - Transcript


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (found at the U.S. Copyright Office) and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.

About Us - Disclaimer

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened..." - Winston Churchill


Advanced Search
Username:

Password:

Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Register

10 Signs The U.S. is Becoming a Third World Country - 08/16SHOCK VIDEO: Alaska State Trooper Grabs at Citizen's Cell Phone Camera During Routine Traffic Stop! - 08/16Government Roid Rage Returns - 08/20Life for Half an Ounce of Medical Marijuana? - 08/12Video: NYPD Undercover Cop Threatens Cameraman with Rape - 08/19Video: Valedictorian Speaks Out Against Schooling - 08/12California surfer films great white sharks circling his board - 08/12Murder a Kid, Plant a Gun -- Take a Vacation - 08/11

ACTA: The War on Progress, Freedom, and Human CivilizationValedictorian Speaks Out Against Schooling in Graduation SpeechFeds Ignore Due Process, First Amendment, Shut Down 73,000 BlogsObama Administration Announces Massive Piracy CrackdownNew Bill Gives Obama 'Kill Switch' To Shut Down The InternetThe "Tax Mahal": A Shrine to Corporate SocialismBilderberg 2010: Between the sword and the wallObama: Life Imprisonment Without Trial
(more)

 
Top